Remediation of Some Heavy Metals, Radionuclides and Bacterial Load of Medically Acclaimed Edible Kaolin doi.org/10.26538/tjnpr/v2i5.3
Main Article Content
Abstract
The earliest recorded mention of clay consumption for healing remedy originated approximately 5,000 years ago. But edible clays have been implicated to contain microbial and metallic contaminants despite the inherent medical benefits. This work reports the remediation of some heavy metals, radionuclides and bacterial load from edible kaolin from Kankara, Nigeria. The remediation increased the pH of the samples except when HCl was used; though the colour and taste remained unaltered. The best extractant for arsenic in the kaolin sample was 0.1M HCl with efficiency of 19%, H2O with efficiencies of 98% and 75% was best for removal of Cr and Pb respectively. The extraction resulted to significant reduction of the concentrations of Cr and Pb in the clay(P < 0.05).The remediation of 232Th and 238U was best by using surfactant solution (Sodium dodecyl sulphate, SDS)with efficiencies of 46% and 35% respectively;while 0.1M CaCl2 with 17% efficiency was the best for228Ra removal. All the clay samples were contaminated with bacteria. Therefore, soil washing technique can be employed to reduce contaminants in edible clay while maintaining the inherent medical benefits of geophagy.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
References
Abrahams PW. Soils: their implications to human health. Science of Total Environ. 2002; 291: 1-32.
Bisi-Johnson MA, Obi CL, Ekosse GE. Microbiological and health related perspectives of geophagia: an overview. Afr J Biotech. 2010; 9(19):5784–5791.
Kutalek R, Wewalka G, Gundacker C, Auer H, Wilson J, Haluza D, Huhulescu S, Hillier S, Sager M, Prinz A. Geophagy and potential health implications: geohelminths, microbes and heavy metals. Trans Royal Soc Trop Med. Hyg 2014; 104(12): 787-795.
Mcloughlin IJ. The picas. Br J Hosp Med. 2004; 37: 286–290.
Reilly C, Henry J. Why do human consume soil? Nutr Bull. 2000; 25: 141-4.
Health Canada. Calabash chalk may pose health risk for pregnant and breastfeeding women. [Online]. 2007 [cited 2018 Mar 12]. Available from: http//:www.ctvnews.ca.
Shakoor IT, Davids TR, Sandeck OL. Cadmium, zinc, iron and arsenic concentration in biological samples. J Phamarcol. 2000; 4:323-434.
Campbell H. Calabash Chalk (Calabar stone, La Craie, Agraile, Nzu, Mabele). [Online]. 2002 [cited 2012 Feb 19]. Available from: http//:www.lef.org.
Bonglaisin JN. Induced geophagy with local kaolin from Cameroon market and heavy metals (lead, cadmium and mercury): profile of rat blood, liver, placentas and litters. J Med Sci. 2015; 15:10-17.
Ogomaka IA. Microorganisms associated with clay (Nzu) consumption (Geophagy) in some parts of Imo State, Nigeria. Int J Curr Microbioi Appl Sci. 2015; 4(1):552-557.
He ZL, Yang XE, Stoffella PJ. Trace elements in agroecosystems and impacts on the environment. J Trace Elements Med Biol. 2005; 19(2–3):125–140.
Omoniyi KI, Abechi SE, Akpa RU. Determination of the physicochemical properties and radiation health hazard indices of ‘Nzu Clay’ obtained from Azonogogo, Delta State and Uzella River in Edo State, Nigeria. Nig J Mat Sci Engr. 2016; 7:87-94.
Ekong MB, John EE, Mbadugha CC, Bassey EI, Ekanem TB.Effect of Calabash Chalk on the Histomorphology of the Gastro-Oesophageal Tract of Growing Wistar Rats. The Malay J Med Sci. 2012; 19(1):30–35.
Isinkaye MO, Shitta MBO, Oderinde MO. Determination of radionuclides and elemental composition of clay soils by gamma- and X-ray spectrometry. SpringerPlus 2013; 2:74.
Eisenbud M, Gesell T. Environmental radioactivity from natural, industrial and military sources. Academic Press: San Diego, California, USA; 1997. 123 - 125 p.
United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation - UNSCEAR. Report to the General Assembly with Scientific Annexes, 2008; Volume II. Scientific Annexes C, D and E.United Nations, New York.
Madigan M, Martinko J. Brock Biology of Microorganisms. (13th edition). Pearson Education; 2006. 1096 p.
Xuhui M, Rui J, Wei X, Jiaguo Y. Use of surfactants for the remediation of contaminated soils: A review. J Hazard Mat. 2015; 285:419–435.
Imamul Huq SM, Chowdhury MTA, Nesa L, Kashem MA. Assessment of the phytoavailability of Cd, Pb and Zn using various extraction procedures. Pedologist 2010; 80 – 95.
Chu W, Kwan CY. Remediation of contaminated soil by a solvent/surfactant system. Chemosphere 2003; 53:9–15.
Conte P, Agretto A, Spaccini R, Piccolo A. Soil remediation: humic acids as natural surfactants in the washings of highly contaminated soils. Environ Poll. 2005; 135:515–522.
Mahdi B, Mohsen F, Mehran K. Humic substances-enhanced electro remediation of heavy metals contaminated soil. J Hazard Mat. 2016; 312:307 – 318.
IS 5887 ( I)-1976. Methods for detection of bacteria responsible for food poisoning. Part 1 Isolation, identification and enumeration of E. coli.
Ahnstrom ZS, Parker DR. Development and assessment of a sequential extraction procedure for the fractionation of soil cadmium. Soil Sci Soc Am J. 1999; 63:1650 – 1658.
Council on Soil Testing and Plant Analysis (CSTPA).Handbook on Reference Methods on Soil Testing. University of Georgia, Athens. 1980.
Cheesbrough M. District Laboratory Manual for Tropical Countires (Low Price Edition). Cambridge University Press, London. 2005.
Costarramone N, Tellier S, Grano S, Lecomte D, Astruc M. Effect of selected conditions on fluorine recovery from a soil, using electrokinetics. Environ Tech. 2000; 21:789–798.
Kim DH, Jeon CS, Baek K, Ko SH, Yang JS. Electrokinetic remediation of fluorine-contaminated soil: Conditioning of analyte. J Hazard Mat. 2009; 161:565–569.
Reddy KR, Chinthamreddy S. Comparison of extractants for removing heavy metals from contaminated clayey soils. Soil Sediment Cont. 2000; 9(5):449–462.
Khodadoust AP, Reddy KR, Maturi K. Effect of different extraction agents on metal and organic contaminant removal from a field soil. J Hazard Mat. 2005; 117(1):15–24