Correlation Analyses of the Oral Biofilm Growth Inhibition towards Hydrophobicity Reduction of Oral Pathogenic Bacteria http://www.doi.org/10.26538/tjnpr/v7i10.4
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Bacteria have a tendency to form multicellular biofilms, which adhere to surfaces and contain extracellular polymeric substances (EPS). This tendency is accompanied by hydrophobic interactions, which are vital in the biofilm attachment process. Oral biofilms contribute to a range of oral health issues, including gingivitis, dental caries, and halitosis. Therefore, this research aimed to investigate the correlation between oral biofilm growth inhibition and hydrophobicity reduction in Streptococcus mutants, Streptococcus sanguinis, Lactobacillus acidophilus, and Actinomyces viscosus. Essential oil-derived compounds, namely eugenol, C-10 massoia lactone, thymol, cinnamaldehyde, and zerumbone, were applied in the experiment. A microdilution assay using crystal violet staining evaluated the oral microbes' biofilm growth. The adhesion of microbes to hexadecane was measured to assess hydrophobicity reduction, which was analyzed correlatively using PAST (Paleontological Statistics) software and the Principal Component Analysis (PCA) method. The results showed a positive correlation of the hydrophobicity reduction towards the biofilm formation inhibition for all tested microbes (graphical angle <45°). The Principal Component (PC) analysis, based on the eigene values, showed that PC1 and PC2 accounted for 54.149% and 25.652% of the total variation, respectively. These two components explained 79.801% of the total variation, indicating a significant level of variability. This finding supported the notion that a greater reduction in microbial hydrophobicity was associated with stronger inhibitory activity against planktonic growth. The hydrophobicity reduction assay may indicate a potential of bioactive compounds against biofilm growth inhibition of oral microbes.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
References
Berlanga M, Guerrero R. Living together in biofilms: the microbial cell factory and its biotechnological implications. Microbial Cell Factories. 2016;15(1):165.
Di Martino P. Extracellular polymeric substances, a key element in understanding biofilm phenotype. AIMS
Microbiol. 2018;4(2):274–88.
Featherstone J. The continuum of dental caries--evidence for a dynamic disease process. Journal of dental research [Internet]. 2004 [cited 2022 Jan 18];83 Spec No C. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15286120/
Rath S, Bal SCB, Dubey D. Oral Biofilm: Development Mechanism, Multidrug Resistance, and Their Effective
Management with Novel Techniques. Rambam Maimonides Med J. 2021;12(1):e0004.
Wake N, Asahi Y, Noiri Y, Hayashi M, Motooka D, Nakamura S, et al. Temporal dynamics of bacterial microbiota in the human oral cavity determined using an in situ model of dental biofilms. NPJ Biofilms Microbiomes. 2016;2:16018.
Holgerson PL, Öhman C, Rönnlund A, Johansson I. Maturation of Oral Microbiota in Children with or without
Dental Caries. PLOS ONE. 2015;10(5):e0128534.
Marsh PD, Head DA, Devine DA. Dental plaque as a biofilm and a microbial community—Implications for treatment. Journal of Oral Biosciences. 2015;57(4):185–91.
Eriksson L, Lif Holgerson P, Esberg A, Johansson I. Microbial Complexes and Caries in 17-Year-Olds with and
without Streptococcus mutans. J Dent Res. 2018;97(3):275–82.
Manome A, Abiko Y, Kawashima J, Washio J, Fukumoto S, Takahashi N. Acidogenic Potential of Oral Bifidobacterium and Its High Fluoride Tolerance. Frontiers in Microbiology [Internet]. 2019 [cited 2023 Jul 13];10. Available from:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2019.01099
Johansson I, Witkowska E, Kaveh B, Lif Holgerson P, Tanner ACR. The Microbiome in Populations with a Low and High Prevalence of Caries. J Dent Res. 2016;95(1):80–6.
Mira A, Simon-Soro A, Curtis MA. Role of microbial communities in the pathogenesis of periodontal diseases and caries. J Clin Periodontol. 2017;44 Suppl 18:S23–38.
Ximenes M, Armas RD de, Triches TC, Cardoso M, Vieira R de S. Structure of the Bacterial Community in Different Stages of Early Childhood Caries. Oral Health Prev Dent. 2018;16(4):369–73.
Sánchez MC, Velapatiño A, Llama‐Palacios A, Valdés A, Cifuentes A, Ciudad MJ, et al. Metataxonomic and
metabolomic evidence of biofilm homeostasis disruption related to caries: An in vitro study. Molecular Oral Microbiology. 2022;37(2):81–96.
Chen X, Daliri EBM, Kim N, Kim JR, Yoo D, Oh DH. Microbial Etiology and Prevention of Dental Caries:
Exploiting Natural Products to Inhibit Cariogenic Biofilms. Pathogens. 2020 14;9(7):569.
Haffajee AD, Teles RP, Patel MR, Song X, Veiga N, Socransky SS. Factors affecting human supragingival
biofilm composition. I. Plaque mass. J Periodontal Res. 2009 ;44(4):511–9.
Radaic A, Kapila YL. The oralome and its dysbiosis: New insights into oral microbiome-host interactions. Comput
Struct Biotechnol J. 2021;19:1335–60.
Hou K, Wu ZX, Chen XY, Wang JQ, Zhang D, Xiao C, et al. Microbiota in health and diseases. Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2022; 23;7:135.
1Nascimento MM. Approaches to Modulate Biofilm Ecology. Dent Clin North Am. 2019 Oct;63(4):581–94.
Chawhuaveang DD, Yu OY, Yin IX, Lam WYH, Mei ML, Chu CH. Acquired salivary pellicle and oral diseases: A
literature review. Journal of Dental Sciences. 2021;16(1):523–9.
Tuson HH, Weibel DB. Bacteria-surface interactions. Soft Matter. 2013 14;9(18):4368–80.
Pouran HM. Bacterial Cell-Mineral Interface, Its Impacts on Biofilm Formation and Bioremediation. In: Hussain CM, editor. Handbook of Environmental Materials Management [Internet]. Cham: Springer International publishing; 2019 [cited 2023 Jul 13]. p. 535–56. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73645-7_80
Jeon J, Rosalen P, Falsetta M. Natural products in caries research: current (limited) knowledge, challenges and future perspective. Caries research [Internet]. 2011 [cited 2022 Jan 18];45(3). Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21576957/
Hamzah H, Tunjung Pratiwi SU, Hertiani T. Efficacy of Thymol and Eugenol Against Polymicrobial Biofilm.
Indonesian J Pharm. 2018;29(4):214.
Utami D, Pratiwi ST, Haniastuti T, Hertiani T. Eugenol and thymol as potential inhibitors for polymicrobial oral
biofilms: An in vitro study. J Int Oral Health. 2021;13(1):45.
Utami DT, Pratiwi SUT, Haniastuti T, Hertiani T. Degradation of Oral Biofilms by Zerumbone from Zingiber
zerumbet (L.). Res. J. of Pharmacy and Technol. 2020 12;13(8):3559–64.
Sharma S, Khan I, Ali I, Ali F, Kumar M, Kumar F. Evaluation of the antimicrobial, antioxidant, and antiinflammatory activities of hydroxychavicol for its potential use as an oral care agent - PubMed. 2009;53:216–22.
Welch K, Cai Y, Strømme M. A method for quantitative determination of biofilm viability. J Funct Biomater.
;3(2):418–31.
Arvidsson, A, Mattisson, I., Blom, K. Evaluation of In Vitro Biofilm Formation on Titanium Nitride Specimens.
Biomaterials and Medical Applications. 2017;
Urmann K, Arshavsky-Graham S, Walter J.G, Scheper T, Segal E. Wholecell detection of live lactobacillus
acidophilus on aptamer-decorated porous silicon biosensors. The Analyst. 2016;141:5432–40.
Hamzah H, Pratiwi SUT, Hertiani T. Efficacy of Thymol and Eugenol Against Polymicrobial Biofilm. Indonesian Journal of Pharmacy. 2018;29(4):214.
Razak FA, Othman RY, Rahim ZHA. The effect of Piper betle and Psidium guajava extracts on the cell-surface
hydrophobicity of selected early settlers of dental plaque. J Oral Sci. 2006;48(2):71–5.
Wang Y, Samaranayake LP, Dykes GA. Tea extracts modulate oral biofilm development by altering bacterial
hydrophobicity and aggregation. Archives of Oral Biology. 2021;122:105032.
Couvigny B, Kulakauskas S, Pons N, Quinquis B, Abraham AL, Meylheuc T, et al. Identification of New Factors
Modulating Adhesion Abilities of the Pioneer Commensal Bacterium Streptococcus salivarius. Frontiers in
Microbiology [Internet]. 2018 [cited 2022 Oct 6];9. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5826255/
Shen S, Zhang T, Yuan Y, Lin S, Xu J, Ye H. Effects of cinnamaldehyde on Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus
aureus membrane. Food Control. 2015;47:196–202.
Gusnaniar N, van der Mei HC, Qu W, Nuryastuti T, Hooymans JMM, Sjollema J, et al. Physico-chemistry of
bacterial transmission versus adhesion. Advances in Colloid and Interface Science. 2017;250:15–24.
Utami DT, Pratiwi SUT, Haniastuti T, Hertiani T. Degradation of Oral Biofilms by Zerumbone from Zingiber zerumbet (L.). Res. J. of Pharmacy and Technol. 2020 Aug 12;13(8):3559–64.
Utami DT, Pratiwi SUT, Haniastuti T, Hertiani T. Cinnamaldehyde’s Potential Inhibitory Effect towards Planktonic and Biofilm of Oral Bacteria. IJPR [Internet]. 2020 Dec 2 [cited 2022 Oct 6];13(01). Available from: http://www.ijpronline.com/ViewArticleDetail.aspx?ID=18536
Utami DT, Tunjung Pratiwi SU, Spaink HP, Haniastuti T, Hertiani T. Antibiofilm effect of C-10 massoia lactone
toward polymicrobial oral biofilms. J Adv Pharm Technol Res. 2021;12(1):89–93.
Utami D, Pratiwi ST, Haniastuti T, Hertiani T. Eugenol and thymol as potential inhibitors for polymicrobial oral
biofilms: An in vitro study. J Int Oral Health. 2021;13(1):45.
Widodo H, Sismindari S, Asmara W, Rohman A. Antioxidant activity, total phenolic and flavonoid contents of
selected medicinal plants used for liver diseases and its classification with chemometrics. J App Pharm Sci. 2019;9(6):99–105.
Neupane R, Boddu SHS, Renukuntla J, Babu RJ, Tiwari AK. Alternatives to Biological Skin in Permeation Studies:
Current Trends and Possibilities. Pharmaceutics. 2020 13;12(2):152.