Comparative Phytochemical and Mineral Element Analysis of Leaf and Stem Bark of Spondiasmombin doi.org/10.26538/tjnpr/v6i7.6
Main Article Content
Abstract
The leaves and stem bark of Spondias mombin have been acclaimed to be used by local populace to treat diseases and as food supplements. The research determined and compared the phytochemicals and mineral composition of the plant leaves and stems bark. The phytochemical analyses were done using standard methods. The mineral element analysis was done using multiple parameter photometer. The result of phytochemical analysis revealed the presence of alkaloids (8.3±0.5%, 1.5±0.4%), flavonoids (11.67±1.4%, 9.8±0.2%), saponins (8.65±0.4%, 5.3±1.2%), tannins (0.96±0.1, 0.88+0.1%) and phenol (1.14±0.01, 1.2±0.01%) for leaves and
stem bark, respectively. While the specific phytochemicals result showed the presence of proanthocynanin, naringenin, flavan-3-ol, anthocyanin, sapogenin, phenol, flavonones, steroids, kaempferol, flavones, catechin and resveratrol at specific concentrations for each extract. Ribalinidine, naringenin, spartein and oxalate were present in the leaves extract and absent in the stem bark extract. Rutin, quinine, ephedrine and epicatechin were present in the stem bark extract and absent in the leaves extract at various concentrations. The mineral element composition of the plant components revealed the presence of aluminum, silicon, phosphorus,
sulphur, potassium, calcium, iron, zinc and copper at different concentration for both leaves and stem bark extract. Magnesium, manganese and cobalt were absent in the leaves extract and slightly present in the stem bark extract. Their various concentrations were not harmful as they are within the permissible range. These compounds contained in the plant have been reported in literatures to possess therapeutic properties against pathogens which have supported the ethnomedical claims and functions of this
plant.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
References
Sofowara A, Ogunbodede E, Onayade A. The role and place of medicinal plants in the strategies for Disease prevention. Afr J Trad Comp Altern Med. 2013; 10 (5):210-229.
Esua OJ, Makinde OO, Arueya GL, Chin NL. Antioxidant potential, phytochemical and nutrient composition of Nigeria hog plum (Spandias mombin) Seed kernel as a new food source. Intern F. Res J.2016; 23(48):179-185.
Duvall CS. On the origin of the tree Spondias mombin. Int Afr J Hist Geo.2006; (32):249-266.
Ajaegbu EE, Uzochukwu IC, Okoye FBC. Antioxidant and Anti-inflammatory Activities of Extract and fractions of Spondias mombin leaf and isolation of its Active principles. Trop J Nat Prod Res. 2022; 6 (1): 80-86.
Adedokun MO, Oladoye AO, Oluwalana SA, Mendie II. Socio-economic importance and utilization of Spondias mombinin Nigeria. Asian Pac J Trop Med.2010; 3(3): 232- 234.
Fadimu OY, Ajiboye AA, Agboola DA, Kadiri M, Adedire MO. Effects of some combination of phytohormones on some growth parameters and vitamin, carbohydrate, protein and chlorophyll contents of Spondias mombin (Linn.). Ife J Sci. 2012; 14(2):397-403.
Ayoka AO, Akomolafe RO, Akinsomisoye OS, Ukponmwan OE. Medicinal and Economic Value of Spondias mombin. Afr J Biomed Res. 2008; 11(2):129- 136.
Spondias mombin [Online]. 2021 [cited 2022 July 2]. Available from: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spondias_mombin
Defilipps RA and Krupnick GA. The medicinal plants of Mymmar. Phytokeys. 2018; 102 (24380):1-341.
Ken F.Spondias mombin. [Online]. 2021 [Cited 20021 sept 30]Available from www.tropical.theferns.info/viewtropical.php?id=Spondias
%20mombin
Alex LV, Alan LV, Karina PR. Pharmacognostic Characterization ofSpondiasmombin L. (Anacardiaceae). Pharmacogn J. 2016; 8 (6):513-519.
Araruna ME, Silva P, Almeida, M, Rego R, Dantas R, Albuquerque H, Cabral I, Apolinario N, Medeiros F, Medeiros A, Santos V. Tablet of Spondiasmombin L. developed from Nebulized extract prevents gastric ulcers in mice via cytoprotective and Antisecretory effects. Molecules (MDPI) 2021; 26(1581):1-17.
Ugariogu SN, Ikezu UJM, Ikpa CBC. Preliminary Pharmaceutical Active Ingredient and Micronutrient Evaluation ofthe Leaf of Corchoruso litorius (Ahiahara). Nat Ayurv Med. 2020; 4(2):000233.
Amin-Mir M, Parihar K, Tabasum U, Kumari E. Estimation of Alkaloid, Saponin and Flavonoid content in various extracts of Crocus Sativa. J Med Plant Stud. 2016; 4(5):171-174.
Dhandapani R and Sabra B. Phytochemical Constituents of some Indian medicinal plants. Anc Sci Life. 2008; 27(4):1-8
Duru CE. Mineral and phytochemical evaluation of Zea mays husk. Sci Afr. 2020; 7(e00224):1-8.
Hanna multi-parameter photometer 83200 manual. Retrieved 20/09/2021. Available from: http://www.pewa.de/datenblatt/dbl_ha_ha83200-02_manual_englisch.pdf
Mamta S, Jyoti S, Rajeev N, Dharmendra S, Abhishek G. Phytochemistry of Medicinal Plants. J Pharmacogn Phytochem. 2013; 1(6):168-182.
Debosree G. Tannin from food to combat diseases. Int J Pharm Res Rev. 2015; 4(5): 40-44.
Milgate J and Roberts D. The Nutritional and biological significant of saponins. Nutr Res. 1995; 15(8): 1223-1241.
Shi J, Arunasalam K, Yeung D, Kakuda Y, Mittal G, Jiang Y. Saponin for edible legume chemistry, processing and health benefits. J Med Food Springer: 2004; 7(1):67-78.
Panche AN, Diwan AD, Chandra SR. Flavonoids: an Overview. J Nutr Sci. 2016; 5 (e47):1-15
Joanna K. Alkaloid, their importance in nature and for human life [Online]. 2019[cited 2022 may 10] Available from: https://www.intechopen.com/chapters/66742.
Abdur R, Muhammad I, Tareq AI, Lahtisham UH, Seema P, Xiandao P, Saima N, Ana SS, Farhan S. and Hafiz AR. Proanthocyanidins: A comprehensive Review. Biomed Pharmacother. 2019; 116(108999):1-6.
Cunha JP. Ephedrine side effects drug center. https//:rxlist.com/ephedrine-side-effect-drug-center.htm# overview. 2020.