Effect of Dietary Supplementation With Tomato By-Products on Zootechnical Performance and Biochemical Parameters in Broilers (Gallus gallus)
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
In Morocco, tomatoes are one of the most produced crops, and the processing industry generates a significant quantity of by-products rich in bioactive compounds that are often undervalued. Therefore, this study sought to valorize these by-products by evaluating the effect of dietary supplementation with tomato by-products on the zootechnical performance and biochemical parameters of broiler chickens (Gallus gallus). A total of 250 one-day-old Cobb 500 chicks were randomized and assigned to 10 groups receiving industrial poultry feed supplemented with tomato by-products at 5%, 10%, and 15% (w/w) during different growth stages (beginning and/or growth) over 40 days. A control group was maintained on the standard diets without additions. Supplementation with tomato by-products affected various parameters depending on the supplementation percentage and stage. Specifically, compared to meat from control group, meat from experimental groups exhibited statistically significant increases in ash content (1.34±0.13 to 1.59±0.18 vs. 1.21±0.11 g/100 g; mean ± SD) and statistically significant decreases in protein content (17.36±0.52 to 21.78±0.84 vs. 22.84±1.08 g/100 g). Additionally, statistically significant improvements in colour differences were observed in meat from experimental groups. Furthermore, chicks maintained on feed supplemented with 5% by-products at the beginning stage demonstrated enhanced zootechnical performance (compared to the control), as evidenced by statistically significant potentiation of Live Weights, Average Daily Gain, and the Consumption Index. Thus, dietary supplementation with tomato by-products positively influenced zootechnical performance and most biochemical parameters of chicken meat, except for protein content. These findings suggest that tomato by-products can serve as a cost-effective supplement.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
References
Hafez HM, Attia YA. Challenges to the Poultry Industry: Current Perspectives and Strategic Future After the COVID-19 Outbreak. Front Vet Sci. 2020; 7.
Thirumalaisamy G, Muralidharan J, Senthilkumar S, Hema Sayee R. Cost - Effective Feeding Of Poultry. Int J Environ Sci Technol. 2016; 5(6):3997–4005.
Der Poel AFBV, Abdollahi MR, Cheng H, Colovic R, Den Hartog LA, Miladinovic D, Page G, Sijssens K, Smillie JF, Thomas M, Wang W, Yu P, Hendriks WH. Future directions of animal feed technology research to meet the challenges of a changing world. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 2020; 270:114692.
Benavides PT, Cai H, Wang M, Bajjalieh N. Life-cycle analysis of soybean meal, distiller-dried grains with solubles, and synthetic amino acid-based animal feeds for swine and poultry production. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 2020; 268:114607.
Frempong NS, Nortey TNN, Paulk C, Stark CR. Evaluating the Effect of replacing fish meal in broiler diets with either Soybean meal or poultry by-product Meal on Broiler Performance and total feed cost per kilogram of gain. J Appl Poult Res. 2019; 28(4):912–8.
Stefanello C, Vieira SL, Carvalho PS, Sorbara JOB, Cowieson AJ. Energy and nutrient utilization of broiler chickens fed corn-soybean meal and corn-based diets supplemented with xylanase. Poult Sci. 2016; 95(8):1881–7.
Abu Hafsa SH, Ibrahim SA. Effect of dietary polyphenol-rich grape seed on growth performance, antioxidant capacity and ileal microflora in broiler chicks. J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr. 2018; 102(1):268–75.
Hafeez A, Männer K, Schieder C, Zentek J. Effect of supplementation of phytogenic feed additives (powdered vs. encapsulated) on performance and nutrient digestibility in broiler chickens. Poult Sci. 2016; 95(3):622–9.
Bailey CA. Chapter 21 - Precision poultry nutrition and feed formulation. In: Bazer FW, Lamb GC, Wu G, editors. Animal Agriculture. Academic Press; 2020. 367–78.
Yitbarek M. Some Selected Vegetable and Fruit Wastes for Poultry Feed. J Vet Anim Res. 2019; 2(102).
Truong L, Morash D, Liu Y, King A. Food waste in animal feed with a focus on use for broilers. Int J Recycl Org Waste Agric. 2019; 8(4):417–29.
Malenica D, Kass M, Bhat R. Sustainable Management and Valorization of Agri-Food Industrial Wastes and By-Products as Animal Feed: For Ruminants, Non-Ruminants and as Poultry Feed. Sustainability. 2022; 15(1):117.
Omre, PK, Singh, S, Shikha. Waste utilization of fruits and vegetables-A review. South Asian J Food Technol Env. 2018; 4(1):605–15.
Achilonu M, Shale K, Arthur G, Naidoo K, Mbatha M. Phytochemical Benefits of Agroresidues as Alternative Nutritive Dietary Resource for Pig and Poultry Farming. J Chem. 2018; 2018:1–15.
Alao B, Falowo A, Chulayo A, Muchenje V. The Potential of Animal By-Products in Food Systems: Production, Prospects and Challenges. Sustainability. 2017; 9(7):1089.
Guil-Guerrero JL, Ramos L, Moreno C, Zúñiga-Paredes JC, Carlosama-Yépez M, Ruales P. Plant-food by-products to improve farm-animal health. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 2016; 220:121–35.
Szabo K, Cătoi AF, Vodnar DC. Bioactive Compounds Extracted from Tomato Processing by-Products as a Source of Valuable Nutrients. Plant Foods Hum Nutr. 2018; 73(4):268–77.
Campos DA, Gómez-García R, Vilas-Boas AA, Madureira AR, Pintado MM. Management of Fruit Industrial By-Products—A Case Study on Circular Economy Approach. Molecules. 2020; 25(2):320.
P. A. Silva Y, Borba BC, Pereira VA, Reis MG, Caliari M, Brooks MSL, Ferreira TAPC. Characterization of tomato processing by-product for use as a potential functional food ingredient: nutritional composition, antioxidant activity and bioactive compounds. Int J Food Sci Nutr. 2019; 70(2):150–60.
Løvdal T, Van Droogenbroeck B, Eroglu EC, Kaniszewski S, Agati G, Verheul M, Skipnes D. Valorization of Tomato Surplus and Waste Fractions: A Case Study Using Norway, Belgium, Poland, and Turkey as Examples. Foods. 2019; 8(7):229.
Secondi L, Principato L, Ruini L, Guidi M. Reusing Food Waste in Food Manufacturing Companies: The Case of the Tomato-Sauce Supply Chain. Sustainability. 2019; 11(7):2154.
Devi B K, Sp K. Utilization of By-product from Tomato Processing Industry for the Development of New Product. J Food Process Technol. 2016; 7(8).
Stoica RM, Tomulescu C, Casarica A, Soare MG. Tomato By-Products As A Source Of Natural Antioxidants For Pharmaceutical And Food Industries - A Mini-Review. 2018; XXII, 2018:200–4.
Nour V, Panaite TD, Ropota M, Turcu R, Trandafir I, Corbu AR. Nutritional and bioactive compounds in dried tomato processing waste. CyTA - J Food. 2018; 16(1):222–9.
Boulaajine S, Hajjaj H. Lycopene Extracted from Tomato - A Review. Food Sci Technol. 2024;12(1):1–14.
De Ancos B, Sánchez‐Moreno C. Biomolecules from Vegetable Wastes. In: Gupta VK, Sarker SD, Sharma M, Pirovani ME, Usmani Z, Jayabaskaran C, editors. Biomolecules from Natural Sources. 1st ed. Wiley. 2022; 278–308.
FAOSTAT. FAOSTAT [Online]. 2024 [cited 2024 May 3]. Available from: https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QCL
Interprofessional federation of the poultry sector. Poultry Sector Statistics. 2024. [Online]. [cited 2024 Jul 31]. Available from: https://www.fisamaroc.org.ma/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=17&Itemid=53
Daghir N, Diab-El-Harake M, Kharroubi S. Poultry production and its effects on food security in the Middle Eastern and North African region. J Appl Poult Res. 2021; 30(1):100110.
Order of the Minister of Agriculture, Maritime Fisheries, Rural Development and Water and Forests. Order No. 3308-17 relating to complementary and special measures to combat Newcastle disease; 21 Rabii I 1439 (10 December 2017). Morocco: Ministry of Agriculture; 2017.
Touzani CD, Maaroufi I, Fellahi S, Berbri IE, Sikht F zohra, Fihri OF, Tligui N, Houadfi ME. Pathogenicity and Effects on Lymphoid Organs of Recent Moroccan Very Virulent Infectious Bursal Disease Virus in Broilers and SPF Chickens. 2021.
Nielsen SS. Sodium Determination Using Ion Selective Electrodes, Mohr Titration, and Test Strips. In: Nielsen SS, editor. Food Analysis Laboratory Manual. Boston, MA: Springer US; 2010; 75–85.
International Organization for Standardization. ISO 936:1998. Meat and meat products — Determination of total ash. Geneva: ISO; 1998.
Nielsen SS. Phenol-Sulfuric Acid Method for Total Carbohydrates. In: Nielsen SS, editor. Food Analysis Laboratory Manual. Boston, MA: Springer US; 2010; 47–53.
International Organization for Standardization. ISO 1443:1973. Meat and meat products — Determination of total fat content. Geneva: ISO; 1973.
International Organization for Standardization. ISO 1871:2009. Food and feed products — General guidelines for the determination of nitrogen by the Kjeldahl method. Geneva: ISO; 2009.
Sánchez-Peña MJ, Márquez-Sandoval F, Ramírez-Anguiano AC, Velasco-Ramírez SF, Macedo-Ojeda G, González-Ortiz LJ. Calculating the metabolizable energy of macronutrients: a critical review of Atwater’s results. Nutr Rev. 2017; 75(1):37–48.
International Organization for Standardization. ISO 5984:2022. Animal feeding stuffs — Determination of crude ash. Geneva: ISO; 2022.
AOAC Official Method 930.15Loss on Drying (Moisture) for Feeds (at 135°C for 2 Hours): Dry Matter on Oven Drying for Feeds (at 135°C for 2 Hours). In: Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC INTERNATIONAL. Oxford University Press; 2023.
International Organization for Standardization. ISO 6492:1999. Animal feeding stuffs — Determination of fat content. Geneva: ISO; 1999.
International Organization for Standardization. ISO 5983-1:2005. Animal feeding stuffs — Determination of nitrogen content and calculation of crude protein content — Part 1: Kjeldahl method. Geneva: ISO; 2005.
International Organization for Standardization. ISO 6865:2000. Animal feeding stuffs — Determination of crude fibre content — Method with intermediate filtration. Geneva: ISO; 2000.
International Organization for Standardization. ISO 6490-1:1985. Animal feeding stuffs — Determination of calcium content — Part 1: Titrimetric method. Geneva: ISO; 1985.
AFNOR. NF EN 15621. Animal feeding stuffs: methods of sampling and analysis - Determination of calcium, sodium, phosphorus, magnesium, potassium, sulphur, iron, zinc, copper, manganese and cobalt after pressure digestion by ICP-AES; 2017.
Wrolstad RE, Smith DE. Colour Analysis. In: Nielsen SS, editor. Food Analysis. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2017; 545–55.
Ferhoum F, Benakmoum A. Effects of different levels of dried tomato corps by-products supplementation on carcass characteristics and fatty acid composition of broiler meat. Algerian J Environ Sci Technol. 2021; 7(1).
Leke JR, Mandey JS, Ratulangi F, Najoan M. Effect of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) protein on carcass and meat quality of kampong chicken. J Indones Trop Anim Agric. 2018; 43(1):35.
Wan X, Yang Z, Ji H, Li N, Yang Z, Xu L, Yang H, Wang Z. Effects of lycopene on abdominal fat deposition, serum lipids levels and hepatic lipid metabolism-related enzymes in broiler chickens. Anim Biosci. 2021; 34(3):385–92.
Aragaw S, Urge M, Zeryehun T, Lemma F. Effect of dried tomato waste meal on growth performance and carcass characteristics of Cobb 500 broiler chicks. Livest Res Rural Dev. 2022; 33.
Gungor E, Altop A, Erener G. Effect of fermented tomato pomace on the growth performance, antioxidant capacity, and intestinal microflora in broiler chickens. Anim Sci J. 2024; 95(1):e13885.
Basir R, Toghyani M. Effect of dietary graded levels of dried lemon (citrus aurantifulia) pulp on performance, intestinal morphology, and humoral immunity in broiler chickens. Int J Recycl Org Waste Agric. 2017; 6(2):125–32.
Gungor E, Altop A, Erener G. Effect of raw and fermented grape seed on growth performance, antioxidant capacity, and cecal microflora in broiler chickens. Animal. 2021; 15(4):100194.
Shaheen M, Ahmad I, Anjum FM, Syed QA, Saeed MK. Effect of processed rice bran on growth performance of broiler chicks from Pakistan. Bulg J Agric Sci. 2015; 21(2):440–5.
S. Al-Tayyar I, Almrsomi T. The Growth Parameters Response of Broiler Chicks Fed Partial replacement of Rice Bran for the Yellow Corn. Al-Qadisiyah J Agric Sci. 2022; 12(1):93–7.
Lokapirnasari WP, Lamid M, Kurnijasanti R, Teriyanto N, Kartika AT, Chandra EH, Riong KK, Yulianto AB. Supplementation of Synbiotic Content of Moringa oleifera Extract and Lactobacillus to Improve Growth Performance in Starter Phase Diet of Broiler Chicken. Trop J Nat Prod Res. 2021; 4(12):1096–100.
Danek-Majewska A, Kwiecień M, Winiarska-Mieczan A, Haliniarz M, Bielak A. Raw Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) as a Substitute of Soybean Meal in Compound Feed for Broiler Chickens: Effects on Growth Performance, Lipid Metabolism, Fatty Acid Profile, Antioxidant Status, and Dietary Value of Muscles. Animals. 2021; 11(12):3367.
Babatunde OO, Park CS, Adeola O. Nutritional Potentials of Atypical Feed Ingredients for Broiler Chickens and Pigs. Animals. 2021; 11(5):1196.
Semwogerere F, Neethling J, Muchenje V, Hoffman LC. Meat quality, fatty acid profile, and sensory attributes of spent laying hens fed expeller press canola meal or a conventional diet. Poult Sci. 2019; 98(9):3557–70.
Travieso MDC, De Evan T, Marcos CN, Molina-Alcaide E. Tomato by-products as animal feed. In: Tomato Processing by-Products. Elsevier; 2022; 33–76.
Wu H, Wang S, Xie J, Ji F, Peng W, Qian J, Shen Q, Hou G. Effects of Dietary Lycopene on the Growth Performance, Antioxidant Capacity, Meat Quality, Intestine Histomorphology, and Cecal Microbiota in Broiler Chickens. Animals. 2024; 14(2):203.