The Effect of Packaged Tea Beverages on Biofilm Thickness of Staphylococcus aureus and MRSA: A Laboratory Experimental Study
Main Article Content
Abstract
Staphylococcus aureus is a pathogenic bacterium responsible for serious infections in humans, with biofilm formation significantly enhancing its antibiotic resistance, particularly in Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). Packaged tea beverages, which contain sugar and various bioactive components, are suspected to influence bacterial biofilm formation. This study aims to analyze the effects of different types of packaged tea beverages on the biofilm thickness of S. aureus and MRSA. The Tissue Culture Plate (TCP) method was used with a 96-well microtiter plate, where bacterial suspensions in Trypticase Soy Broth (TSB) were exposed to various packaged teas. After 48 hours of incubation at 37°C, biofilms were stained with crystal violet, and Optical Density (OD) was measured at 492 nm using an ELISA reader. Results showed that Tea J, with a sugar concentration of 8.06 g/100 mL, exhibited the highest OD for Methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA) at 0.192, while Tea I, with 9 g/100 mL sugar concentration, showed the highest OD for MRSA at 0.112. Other packaged teas also demonstrated elevated OD values, indicating moderate to high biofilm-forming potential. These findings suggest that packaged tea beverages, particularly those with higher sugar content, contribute to increased biofilm formation in S. aureus and MRSA, posing potential risks for bacterial persistence and resistance in consumers. This study highlights the need for further research on dietary influences on bacterial biofilm formation and their implications for public health.
Downloads
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
References
1. Wisconsin Department of Health Services. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) [Internet]. 2024. Available from: https://www.dhs.wisconsin.gov/disease/mrsa.htm
2. Tong SYC, Davis JS, Eichenberger E, Holland TL, Fowler VG. Staphylococcus aureus infections: Epidemiology, pathophysiology, clinical manifestations, and management. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2015;28(3):603–661.
3. World Health Organization. WHO publishes a list of bacteria for which new antibiotics are urgently needed. WHO [Internet]. 2017. Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/detail/27-02-2017-who-publishes-list-of-bacteria-for-which-new-antibiotics-are-urgently-needed
4. Schilcher K, Horswill AR. Staphylococcal biofilm development: Structure, regulation, and treatment strategies. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2020;84(3). Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32792334/
5. Indrasti D, Siliyya F. [Attributes of ready-to-drink packaged tea that influence consumer perception in Tegal Regency]. J Mutu Pangan. 2022;8(2):70–79. (in Indonesian)
6. Center for Indonesia's Strategic Development Initiatives (CISDI). Factsheet on Sugar-Sweetened Beverages (SSBs) Consumption in Indonesia. CISDI [Internet]. 2022. Available from: https://cisdi.org/riset-dan-publikasi/publikasi/dokumen/factsheet-konsumsi-mbdk-di-indonesia
7. Donlan RM. Biofilms: Microbial life on surfaces. Emerg Infect Dis. 2002;8:881–890.
8. Payne DE, Martin NR, Parzych KR, Rickard AH, Underwood A, Boles BR. Tannic acid inhibits Staphylococcus aureus surface colonization in an IsaA-dependent manner. Infect Immun. 2013;81(2):496–504.
9. Singh A, Prakash P, Achra A, Singh G, Das A, Singh R. Standardization and classification of in vitro biofilm formation by clinical isolates of Staphylococcus aureus. J Glob Infect Dis. 2017;9(3):93–101.
10. Vitko NP, Spahich NA, Richardson AR. Glycolytic dependency of high-level nitric oxide resistance and virulence in Staphylococcus aureus. mBio. 2015;6(2). Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25852157/
11. Luo Z, Yue S, Chen T, She P, Wu Y, Wu Y. Reduced growth of Staphylococcus aureus under high glucose conditions is associated with decreased pentaglycine expression. Front Microbiol. 2020;11. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.537290
12. Jahani S, Bazi S, Shahi Z, Sheykhzade Asadi M, Mashhady MA, Sohil Baigi G. Effects of methanol extract of green tea on biofilm formation of Staphylococcus aureus. Int J Infect. 2016;4(3). doi: 10.5812/iji.42394
13. Behbahani SB, Kiridena SD, Wijayaratna UN, Taylor C, Anker JN, Tzeng TJ. pH variation in medical implant biofilms: Causes, measurements, and its implications for antibiotic resistance. Front Microbiol. 2022;13:1028560. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2022.1028560
14. Nostro A, Cellini L, di Giulio M, D’Arrigo M, Marino A, Blanco AR, Cionci NB, Bruni A. Effect of alkaline pH on Staphylococcus biofilm formation. Acta Pathol. Microbiol. Immunol. Scand. 2012;120(9):733–742.
15. Marinelli P, Pallares I, Navarro S, Ventura S. Dissecting the contribution of Staphylococcus aureus α-phenol-soluble modulins to biofilm amyloid structure. Sci Rep. 2016;6. doi.org/10.1038/srep34552
16. Li P, Mei J, Xie J. Carbon dioxide can inhibit biofilm formation and cellular properties of Shewanella putrefaciens at both 30°C and 4°C. Food Res Int. 2022;161. doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2022.111781
17. Schelin J, Susilo YB, Johler S. Expression of Staphylococcal enterotoxins under stress encountered during food production and preservation. Toxins. 2017; 9(12):401. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins9120401.
18. Liu Y, Zhang J, Ji Y. Environmental factors modulate biofilm formation by Staphylococcus aureus. Sci Prog. 2020;103(1):36850419898659. doi:10.1177/0036850419898659